77C5B7F9-38A0-4E11-AC5A-F8F07EA588E4Created with sketchtool. 17BC922E-A277-4A6A-AA76-B2A7D6098ACCCreated with sketchtool. D5445BF2-384C-42FD-A0D7-E711622BFEA7Created with sketchtool. 60DB23C6-0A0E-416C-B8D7-E79812A5CFE1Created with sketchtool. Stroke 40Created with Sketch. 8DB95E45-CF3A-4648-8C6C-4625DACDBD41Created with sketchtool. 9C53C15A-EAD0-4B24-A7EE-6911E2A88728Created with sketchtool. 957E397E-71F7-4C25-9EE2-EBAECCEE95F0Created with sketchtool. 0BEB1C53-E60D-4035-A803-CD7BA8406370Created with sketchtool. 9E686F2E-AFF4-4CE2-9279-1B89F1DAB51ACreated with sketchtool. 3E27AD83-8FB3-446D-BE67-0CFB5026D62ACreated with sketchtool. A34E87DF-769C-4EB4-8F1D-BFD735A04A9CCreated with sketchtool. DF8B0DB2-6EC8-4C72-97DC-8ACA7E23C9CBCreated with sketchtool. 8A668BDD-39B7-4921-8B21-4CCFCA93F649Created with sketchtool. 8335254A-2A25-4F34-989D-486F9628BA04Created with sketchtool. 18A57D06-6606-4CE2-BC31-5C8B5788FF25Created with sketchtool. F000F9E4-E2A4-454D-81CE-F7BD4F4F6B33Created with sketchtool. 2215F297-B843-4486-B3E4-616CF9D6BCEECreated with sketchtool. 2235CA9E-FE06-42DF-912E-D5D96788F764Created with sketchtool. 2FD05F24-1B9B-45AC-9B7A-598A9B5F40CCCreated with sketchtool. BA8A0FC5-1F29-4D3E-AC99-5FCB660A57C5Created with sketchtool. crossCreated with Sketch. D7CC1683-7A2E-4C26-BBEE-4EC9EF0A7D04Created with sketchtool. C9758992-E447-4487-89E0-77D464BE9CB7Created with sketchtool. 0DAC0DDF-A761-4B36-A1E3-B9908EB37B71Created with sketchtool. 9113F7AD-D502-42ED-AAF9-61F4F9D6FB28Created with sketchtool. E24E938B-CE7D-498E-9E93-58F41F9F03F7Created with sketchtool. 74A8A7AD-4574-491C-BEC5-7BCC7358BA30Created with sketchtool. D8AB9BFE-36DF-44A3-9F3D-B81FEF0AC568Created with sketchtool. 5AD74AD9-6660-4A5B-9621-06A05E34F5C3Created with sketchtool. 6012AB6E-07E2-4A06-A3BA-1217CA7ABB15Created with sketchtool. 4CC35754-290A-483A-9BF3-FCEFF49B574CCreated with sketchtool. CC6E353A-7BB0-4178-ADE5-34BC27526C09Created with sketchtool. B5670A14-7A5A-44A5-AC43-452E8C7D3A89Created with sketchtool. 77922C3C-317C-43A0-B4D4-28593FDC135ECreated with sketchtool. 77922C3C-317C-43A0-B4D4-28593FDC135ECreated with sketchtool. 3EF017C1-1C66-478C-ADE0-246F207E4F63Created with sketchtool. 58F4DB82-8906-43CD-B585-43896A2DC6A8Created with sketchtool. 0FBABABC-A68F-4798-BEAE-8198899243AECreated with sketchtool. 48492AC4-A2D8-4CF8-A14E-A6CA62317D00Created with sketchtool. 5C9682FB-CDF0-41D7-8ABD-F38A0A3594E1Created with sketchtool. 0FC24ED3-7631-48ED-A4BF-40A478DB72FDCreated with sketchtool. 7944064D-2772-4392-A51D-A02849A32DB8Created with sketchtool. 79B74B7C-17D3-4467-BAE8-9BDE3E5198BACreated with sketchtool. 51D0D7F1-3D2D-4E47-859C-B4479AC0F578Created with sketchtool. 78CE4218-ADE6-4654-ACAD-E7CD05EBC273Created with sketchtool. 4EF0E792-D12B-433B-B6FD-D31326B7D643Created with sketchtool. WE’RE HIRING!
Product Pricing Customers Blog

Resources

Management Guides Help Centre
Login Start free trial

How Employees Judge Whether They're Fairly Paid

How Employees Judge Whether They're Fairly Paid

From the landmark theory of psychologist Frederick Herzberg in the sixties, right up to Daniel Pink’s recent bestseller Drive – the science backing these investigations into human motivation, shows us that pay is misunderstood on an industrial scale.

In all but the most menial and repetitive of tasks, intrinsic motivators (e.g. freedom, feelings of achievement and mastery, etc.) have a far greater influence on engagement and motivation than pay. However, compensation can negatively affect performance, if employees feel they’re being mistreated.

Compensation, then, should not be treated as the route to higher performance, but instead we should simply work towards ensuring pay is a non-issue – make sure employees are not unhappy with their pay, and get the topic off the table to focus on more important things.

How employees judge whether they’re fairly paid is actually a broader topic than most would immediately assume, or would probably allude to when talking about their own pay. Organisational Justice Theory gives us an explanation, with the three principles that fair pay adheres to.

Distributive Justice – does the output I receive match my input?

The most obvious belief we all hold around pay is that outcomes should be distributed proportionally to inputs – the so‐called “Equity Principle” (Adams, 1965). Outputs can be in the form of wages and other rewards, while inputs include education, training, experience and effort.

It’s hard, however, for employees to objectively determine if their rewards match their input. In response, people tend to make relative judgements based on the perceptions they have about those closest to them. For example, whether they believe their contribution is rewarded on a par with their peers.

If this causes an employee to feel under-rewarded, they may restore perceived equity by reducing their inputs (slacking off), attempting to reduce others’ inputs (convincing coworkers to do less work), seeking to increase their outcomes (asking for a raise), or aiming to decrease coworkers’ outcomes (asking the boss to standardise salaries).

Most organisations provide the foundations for this principle with standardised pay grades, training opportunities, etc., while avoiding arbitrary decisions and favouritism. 

Procedural Justice – is the process for calculating pay fair?

Even if employees don’t receive the output they want in relation to their input, hard feelings can be avoided if they agree the process that lead to this output was conducted fairly. In this sense, Procedural Justice outweighs Distributive Justice. Fair processes are characterised by:

  • Consistency – the same criteria that is used to determine pay decisions must apply to everyone over time.
  • Neutrality – decisions are based on facts, not on vested interests, or personal feelings of the decision maker.
  • Accuracy – the information used to formulate and justify decisions is correct and not based on hearsay.
  • Ethicality – employees don’t suffer discrimination on grounds of age, gender, nationality and other extraneous factors.

The degree to which employees believe procedures and processes are fair, can be enhanced by ensuring they have the chance to discuss and voice concerns before decisions are made – this is known as the “Voice Principle”. Psychologists explain that this fulfils our particular need to be heard and feel part of a group, rather than passively waiting for our fate to be decided by others (Storey, 2000).

Interactional Justice – how am I treated in decision making processes?

In some respects, Interactional Justice can be grouped with Procedural Justice. However, Organisational Justice Theory sees it as significant enough to be considered in its own right. It refers to how pay decisions are reached with employees (Bies and Moag, 1986).

Employees should be able to enter in discussions, in which realistic and accurate information is presented to them openly, where they feel as though they’re treated courteously and in no way intimid or pressured. If they perceive a particular injustice – e.g. inaccurate reward for their effort (as discussed in the Distribution Principle) – they should be able to get a clear explanation based on the principles of Procedural Justice, and if none is available, and apology and action to address any unfairness.

Following these three principles will improve the confidence employees have that they’re fairly rewarded for their work – in turn enabling managers to focus on delivering an employee experience that fosters intrinsic motivation to increase engagement and job satisfaction.

Get started now

Almost there,
check your inbox

We've sent you an email to verify your account.